Change
is a fundamental human experience. Philosophers, wisdom teachers,
writers, and scientists have all attested to this pervasive phenomenon
in their own way, trying to explain, illustrate, or at least understand
how "Everything changes except the fact of change."
Heraclitus
believed that the world was in a perpetual state of change, while
Gautama Buddha suggested that the universal principle of impermanence
is foundational to all existence. The I Ching, arguably one
of the most influential expressions of Chinese culture, attempts
to describe changes in the universe through a comprehensive system
of 64 gua (hexagrams). In the Bible, many books - Exodus,
Job, Ecclesiastes, the Gospels, and others - take change for
granted, then reveal how it affects human beings.
Both
physicians and non-medical psychotherapists are facilitators, catalysts,
and promoters of change. With each prescription doctors write, they
are fostering change in their patients' state of health; with each
diagnostic test they order, they are preparing for possible change
in their patients. Psychotherapists might recommend relaxation skills
for clients suffering from stress, or communication skills for embattled
families.
Whether
attempting to treat patients' illnesses or improve clients' wellness,
physicians and individual, couple, and family therapists create
a milieu within which some form of change can occur. But what drives
change? How do people change? What are the factors that facilitate
change?
In
my own medical practice, I have encountered many individuals who
have serious struggles with addictions. All of them have been through
treatment programs at least once, if not several times. Some of
them are so addicted that they have lost their livelihood and shattered
their families. They know that their addictions harm both themselves
and their loved ones. Most of them want to change. Some do change;
but despite vigorous efforts, many do not.
This
dilemma is not new. St. Paul, one of the great shapers of Western
culture, certainly never thought of himself as a saint. He confesses,
"I do not understand what I do. For what I want to do I do not do,
but what I hate I do....For I have the desire to do what is good,
but I cannot carry it out. For what I do is not the good I want
to do; no, the evil I do not want to do - this I keep on doing....What
a wretched man I am!" (Romans 14-23)
Many
people are vulnerable to what William Miller calls "The Righting
Reflex." By this he means a "built-in desire to set things right."
This phenomenon is particularly common for individuals attracted
to the healing arts or helping professions. Whenever we meet any
resistance from patients or clients, our natural response is to
push harder.
Henri
Nouwen, one of the most inspiring spiritual writers of our time,
cautions us against the potential of violence in the process of
teaching and doing therapy. This possibility is especially real
if "teaching" (or therapy) is understood to be the mere transfer
of knowledge. The script of many therapeutic dramas contains a tug-of-war
between the doctor or therapist who prescribes a change and the
patient or client who resists change.
How
then shall we practice medicine or psychotherapy so that we avoid
the pitfalls of the Righting Reflex? What model would facilitate
intentional change in an empathic, effective milieu?
The "ABCs" of Changing Problem Behaviours.
A
in ABCs stands for activity. It includes the tasks,
techniques, and interventions that are part of successful strategies
for change.
We
need to ask, "Are the therapeutic processes that we suggest to clients
realistic for their particular case?" They had better be.
B
stands for bond. It refers to the relational bond between
physician and patient, or therapist and clients, that evolves during
therapy. The question here: "Is the attachment 'good enough'?"
If it is not, the chances of success are greatly diminished.
C
stands for change stages. It refers to James Prochaska's
five stages of change. Change stages are a question of timing: When
to do which stage of change to achieve what (goals and objectives)?
We need to be mindful of the question: "Is the timing right
for the person, couple, or family?"
We
have all heard stories of how people may undergo dramatic character
alterations after a deeply spiritual experience. Doctors and therapists
have been puzzled by the mystery of intentional change. Recent
research performed by Prochaska and his colleagues have somewhat
penetrated this mystery.
Prochaska
began his research on change associated with the difficulties of
stopping smoking and overeating. But if there is a universal principle
underlying intentional change, Prochaska's model should be applicable
to other unwanted behaviours such as cocaine use, unsafe sex, overexposure
to the sun, violent rages, and the like. This has subsequently proved
to be the case.
In
each of the five stages of change, people seem to have a unique
set of beliefs about themselves. Moreover, people in each change
state seem to have their own sense of timing about readiness to
change. Individuals, couples, and families move through these states
in different ways and at different speeds.
The Five Change States
1.
Precontemplative
Stage: People in this stage do not consider the need to change.
They do not perceive themselves as having any problems. If there
is a problem, it is external to them. They may say, "I am just fine
the way I am. My behaviour is not a problem. If you think it is,
that's your problem." This is frequently the stage that one
partner is in when a couple comes to therapy.
2.
Contemplative
Stage: People in this stage begin to consider the possibility
that they might be responsible for their problem behaviour. They
may not take any action to change; this stage is more akin to an
intellectual acknowledgement of their personal contribution to the
problem. They may ask, "I might have a problem with my behaviour,
but can I really do anything about it?" Contemplators may
intend to take action, but they may not yet have the behaviour-change
strategies or emotional commitment that real change requires. Despite
their serious intention to take action in the near future, contemplators
can sometimes become stuck at this stage for long periods.
3.
Preparation
Stage: People in this stage know they have to change.
They feel they have to change. They have already taken some
proactive steps toward modifying their problem behaviour. They show
a combination of rational understanding, emotional commitment, and
the beginning of a journey toward change. In this stage, individuals,
couples, and families may have a sense of urgency that actions
need to be taken in days or weeks. Many couples or families who
are locked into destructive anger patterns enter therapy at this
stage.
4.
Action
Stage: People in this stage have launched full-scale actions
both within themselves and within their environment to overcome
their problem. This is also the stage where lay persons and professionals
alike may erroneously equate action with change. People
in this stage believe that "I am actually doing something about
my problem right now." In fact, this is a beginning towards
effective long-term change.
5.
Maintenance
Stage: In this stage, people are fully engaged in preventing
recurrence of their problem behaviour. Prochaska emphasizes the
importance of recognizing that "maintenance is a continuation
of change, not its absence." Some examples of this stage are: Implementing
an anger management contract within the family, or attending regular
meetings of Alcoholics Anonymous to maintain sobriety.
As
a doctor or therapist supports people as they navigate each stage
of change, by empathically validating their feelings, helping them
interpret events, articulate deep emotions, and resolve the unresolved
psychic traumas of life, real change should seem less like an impossibility
and less like a resented burden. Instead, intentional change is
seen as more like a series of actions that are desirable in themselves,
lead to a desirable goal, and often bring healing and restoration
to relationships.
Danny
S.C. Yeung, M.D., C.C.F.P.
Associate Clinical Director
For Further
Reading
Miller, William
R., and C'de Baca, Janet. Quantum Change. New York: Guilford
Press, 2001.
Norcross, John
C. Systems of Psychotherapy: A Transtheoretical Analysis.
Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, 1999.
Prochaska,
James O., et al. Changing for Good. New York: Avon Books,
1994.